www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon-powershot-sd940-is.9752037
6.5 out of 10

Canon PowerShot SD940 IS / Digital IXUS 120 IS / IXY 220 IS

Canon PowerShot SD940 IS The Canon PowerShot SD940 IS is pa Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Canon PowerShot SD940 IS / Digital IXUS 120 IS / IXY 220 IS

Showing 1-10 of 13
Overall 6
6.0

Cannot change focus while recording video

Mitch Chapman, Amazon
21 October 2010
  • Summary: I bought this camera for its ability to record 720p video. Although it was obvious from reviews that the optical zoom could not be used while recording video, it was not at all clear that the camera does not change focus while recording. If your subject moves closer to the camera (or farther away) while recording, it will go out of focus. I missed this when reading other reviews.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Good Point-and-shoot

davidhickle, Ebay
19 September 2010
  • Summary: This camera is a good point and shoot camera. It also takes pretty decent videos, including in low light. However, it is a point and shoot - it can't really be used for anything else, and it has very few settings to play with. It is really small which I like, the LCD screen's pretty decent too. The buttons on the back are pretty hard to push - they're flat and not raised up, so they're pretty hard to find.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Disappointed

someone special, Amazon
5 September 2010
  • Summary: I bought this to replace my Canon SD800 that was 3 years old. I really wanted the ability to shoot video in 720p. Contrary to most people, I think these small cameras are great for shooting video, especially of family and kids. Its small enough to keep in your pocket and whip it out whenever there is something video worthy.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Only if camera size is the most imp criteria

RoyTech "RoyTech", Amazon
17 July 2010
  • Summary: If your last camera was a stone age 3.1 MP Kodak EasyShare DX6340, then almost any camera bought today will be miles ahead. This camera needs to be compared against the current crop of cameras on the market and not an ancient kodak. Technology has really leapfrogged in the past year or two and Canon seems to be resting on its past laurels while other companies are catching up. I bought both this and the Panasonic ZS-7 recently. The ZS-7 is hands down a winner.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Takes great pics but the mic for taking videos is terrible

P. Romero, Amazon
20 June 2010
  • Summary: I bought this camera because I wanted to upgrade my CANON SD1000 so after reading reviews i bought this camera. I wanted a new Canon with HD video so that was the main reason for upgrading. The SD940IS takes great pictures, you can hardly tell a difference between the SD1000 7.1 MP pics and the SD940 12.1 MP pics, but they do look slightly better on the SD940. Now the video is another story. I go out to many electronic dance music parties and I take a lot of video.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Disappointed, looking for replacement

Kevin K. Fosler, Amazon
6 June 2010
  • Summary: I have had many Canon cameras over the years, so I expected a lot from this camera. Prior to this one I had a SD880IS which was larger but had a really good design with a larger LCD and raised controls (not flush like this one). More about the camera ..... The main thing I don't like about the camera is that with the auto mode I got some blurry shots. That was indoor on auto with flash off while subject is not completely still. I had much better luck in program mode.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

User Review

robin1980, DP Review
5 November 2009
  • Excerpt: This camera DOES NOT have a "Superfine" jpeg mode as the details say. It has Fine and Normal only. I actually compared the output from the Ixus120 with an old Ixus30, which does Superfine, and the image results are literally -the same- in terms of noise and jpeg artifacting. The difference is that the Ixus120 produces smaller files.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

User Review

Strider1994, DP Review
30 September 2009
Overall 6
6.0

Not very impressed!

Bryan Gray, Amazon
1 February 2010
  • Summary: I'm a great canon fan, but I'm less then impressed with this recent camera I purchased as a today-to-today pocket camera. Firstly the lovely looking paintwork was scratched within hours of buying it and within a couple of weeks it looked like it was 2 year old. Maybe my own fault for not using a case but the last ixus I had stood up very well to my abuse.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

User Review

АлександрKA, club.foto.ru
30 April 2013
  • Excerpt: Фотографией занимаюсь всю жизнь, этот с позволения сказать фотоаппарат купил в подарок для дочки, вроде все технические характеристики меня устраивали, это и широкий угол и диафрагма 2,8, но сейчас есть твердое желание выкинуть его. Не покупайте!!!!!
  • Pros: дизайн/, 24 августа 2010. Хочу немного реабилитировать фотоаппарат, но не намного. Предыдущие сообщения не стираю. Добавляю несколько фотографий. Все таки надо им научиться пользоваться, а это не для аппаратов такого класса. Все фото сделаны с монопода, при минимальной исо и при ручных настройках
  • Cons: отвратительное качестово фото при любых условиях, даже при самых благоприятных. Резкость отсутствует как понятие. Фото при вспышке напоминают фото при свете спичкой. Видео нормального качества только при самом широком угле, при зуме и при перекадровке резкость не наводиться пока не остановишь запись и снова не прижмешь кнопку спуска, возникают пиксели., P.S. после 4-х месяцев пребывания у меня этого аппарата стал рыться в инструкции и нашел дополнительные настройки ре...
  • Read full review Translate to English
Next page >>