www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon PowerShot Pro70
2.3 out of 10

Canon PowerShot Pro70

Designed for those who are serious about their photography, the Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Canon PowerShot Pro70

Showing 1-10 of 47
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

Owen, DP Review
5 August 2004
  • Excerpt: I've owned around 10 digital cameras so far (one was an slr) and the Pro70 is, without a doubt, my favourite of the lot! I purchased a new/unused example 6 months ago that had been hidden away, unopened for 6 years. When I first realized that it had a minimum (!) shutter speed of 1/180th sec...
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

User Review

infrared35, DP Review
1 August 2002
  • Excerpt: The Powershot Pro 70 is an interesting camera - it's got 2 CF card slots, which can allow for an extraordinary number of pictures to be taken. The rechargeable battery seems to last sufficiently, and the optics are nice and sharp. The ability to use EX-series speedlights with E-TTL is a great bonus.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

Rich, DP Review
25 February 2002
  • Excerpt: Having owned one for nearly a year and being very happy with it I tried out a 3-mp canon s30 for a while. Well, I'm back to the pro70, the images just look more natural and have a more accurate color balance. The lens is as good as it gets on a consumer digicam.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

Unknown user 69783, DP Review
22 November 2001
  • Excerpt: Very good quality images, sometimes a lag in taking a shot immediately after previous one. No flash incorporated, but most compact camera flash's are only just up to the job of a few metres. The camera is very robust and has a real quality feel.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

User Review

Unknown user 68314, DP Review
12 November 2001
  • Excerpt: Exellent picture quality for a 1.5 megapixel camera. Great lens and great construction. Problems: Very slow in everything. Shutter lag time, zoom lag time, image write lag time, automatic focus lag time. Burst mode only works with low res setting which produce poor picture quality.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

User Review

Unknown user 62933, DP Review
5 October 2001
  • Excerpt: I have owned two of these cameras. The first one I used for Real Estate photography, producing 6000 excellent images for the company I was working for. I sold the first one because that Real Estate company went out of business. I bought the second one hoping to use it for event photography.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

Unknown user 16359, DP Review
16 February 2000
  • Excerpt: The coolpix 950 blows it away . The camera is almost unusable for anthing moving i have one and i don't use becouse it becouse of that .
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

Brian Kennedy, DP Review
21 September 1999
  • Excerpt: Most of the good and bad points have been covered; I'll be brief. Those considering this camera should read Phil Askey's full review. As others have said, the image quality of this camera is excellent. Even at "only" 1536x1024, you get a very high quality image.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

Unknown user 11761, DP Review
19 September 1999
  • Excerpt: I particularly like this camera for its excellent picture quality, superbly natural colour, true 28mm wide angle lens (with no distortion anywhere in the zoom range) and 3:2 aspect ratio. The twin compact flash slots are useful too, allowing greater storage capacity and very quick card 'changes'.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

Unknown user 11718, DP Review
17 September 1999
  • Excerpt: the best camera i've seen until today (9/17/99) in my opinion the better choice, instead of 2MP cameras like the olympus c2000n the nikon 950 (no real 2mp too) or the sony, that only works with that sony typical "memory sticks " (urghhh) Problems: The "poor" macro, and i'am missing the possibility...
  • Read full review
Next page >>