www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon-ixus-220-hs.32752488
7.9 out of 10

Canon IXUS 220 HS / ELPH 300 HS

Incredibly Thin. Incredibly Powerful. Don't let the PowerShot EL Read more

Great Deal: $272.70

Reviews and Problems with Canon IXUS 220 HS / ELPH 300 HS

Showing 1-10 of 24
Overall 3
3.0

disappointed

LL-Regina, CNET
28 March 2012
  • Summary: I'm comparing this camera to the Cannon A75 camera (I own two). I found the pictures on the Elph to be blurry (reviewers list this as a soft focus picture). If I want a blurry picture - I'll blur them with photoshop. I expect a camera to give a sharply focused picture at the point of focus (impossible to get it sharply focused with photoshop later - at least not to the same quality if it was done correctly at the time the picture was taken).
  • Pros: small, fast start up, some nice features
  • Cons: compared to my two Cannon A75's, I was disappointed in the picture quality - especially the sharpness of the image. The A75's (3.4 meg) produce much more sharply focused pictures.
  • Read full review
Overall 3
3.0

"disappointed"

LL-Regina, CNET
28 March 2012
  • Pros: small, fast start up, some nice features
  • Cons: compared to my two Cannon A75's, I was disappointed in the picture quality - especially the sharpness of the image. The A75's (3.4 meg) produce much more sharply focused pictures.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

"Don't buy if you like to go outside"

owen.nelson, CNET
6 December 2011
  • Pros: Excellent image quality. Video is crisp. Lots of features.
  • Cons: Weak design. Breaks easily. Lens protector traps dirt and dust constantly.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Returned Camera after 1 week

rephil1, epinions.com
3 June 2011
  • Excerpt: I'm no camera expert but after reading tons of reviews from several websites I decided to purchase t
  • Pros: Light weight, small and compact
  • Cons: grainy pictures, really bad pictures in light light
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

not the IXUS i knew

ian, Amazon
24 July 2012
  • Summary: .purchased the Cannon 220 because i thought it would 'match' and surpass my Cannon 115 (which was brilliant till it stopped working !!).My mem. card was not compatible/no built in shots when not got a mem. card in/more complex instuctions/NO COMPLIMENTARY CASE as was advertised in the details of sale which i responded too !
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Mixed reactions

D. J. Burrows "David Burrows", Amazon
11 August 2011
  • Summary: I bought this camera because I wanted something pocketable with better colour reproduction that the Samsung WB2000 that I had been using. Having had Canon cameras in the past, I was expecting to be impressed and reading other people's reviews I was expecting great things. I took the camera out for a walk on a bright sunny morning. The results looked great on the LCD but when I viewed them on the computer I was very disappointed.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

БАШЛАКОВ ТИМУР, Yandex
19 June 2014
  • Excerpt: Если брать именно canon то можно брать на 100 долларов дешевле и качество фото будет такое же!
  • Pros: красивый, удобный, хорошая макросъемка.
  • Cons: Фотоаппараты этой же фирмы делают фотографии такого же плохого качества только за гораздо меньшие деньги. Более менее нормальные фото получаются только в солнечную погоду.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 4
4.0

Kann bei Tele nicht mehr fokusieren

Naseweis "AL", Amazon
21 April 2014
  • Summary: Nach einer S90 nun schon die 2. Canon Kamera die im Telebereich nicht mehr fokusiert.Bei den letzten 2 Stops werden die Bilder absolut unscharf. Das hat bei der S90 auch so angefangen. Dort gehen inzwischen nur noch die ersten 3 Weitwinkel Stops. Ansonsten ist es eine nette Kamera mit guten Ergebnissen für die Größe.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 4
4.0

Nicht Empfehlenswert!!!

Jürgen K., Amazon
21 September 2013
  • Summary: Ich habe die Kamera einige Zeit gehabt. An der Ixus Reihe mag ich die handlichkeit und die Qualität der Materialien die wirklich gut ist. Leider finde ich die Kamera, wie auch viele andere kleinen von Canon hoffnungslos überteuert. Die Bildqualität ist bei Sonnenlicht gut, das kann aber auch eine 50€ Rollei. Der kleine Zoom und der standard Sensor ist nichts besonderes. Die Rauschunterdrückung bügelt viele Details weg.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

Алмакаев Ряшит, Yandex
7 September 2013
  • Excerpt: очень разачарован в фирме Canon, почему более старые и дешевые мыльницы делают более качественные и четкие снимки, складывается впечатление , что производители фотокамер намеренно понижают периодически качество устройств , чтобы породить новую волну спроса на более новые модели , чтобы бизнес не умер) Ну а в целом эту камеру можно использовать лишь для съемки видео, у меня старенький телефон и что удивительно даже у него снимки более четкие
  • Pros: небольшой, удобно лежит в руке, сочное яркое видео, корпус металл
  • Cons: фотографии))), при любых настройках присутствует приличная размытость, аккумулятор слабоват, ужасный режим авто снимать на авто не советую, при съемки видео постоянно плавает фокус
  • Read full review Translate to English
Next page >>