www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Canon-digital-ixus-110-is-powershot-sd960.32758576
6.5 out of 10

Canon PowerShot SD960 / Digital IXUS 110 IS / IXY Digital 510 IS

Immediate gratification is the pulse of today, and the PowerShot Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Canon PowerShot SD960 / Digital IXUS 110 IS / IXY Digital 510 IS

Showing 1-10 of 14
Overall 4
4.0

Cute camera, but user interface is clumsy and pictures are not sharp

pierrel2, Amazon
16 May 2014
  • Summary: The headline more or less says it: bought this for my wife - she hated it because she could never find simple functions she needed. Also, the pictures, even at midday, were not sharp.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Disappointed

John, Amazon
17 December 2011
  • Summary: This camera was expensive and failed to prove its value. I've had it for less than 2 years and the sexy metal face is coming off of the front. The most "abuse" the camera has suffered is being put in my pocket, which is the whole point of a small camera. In addition, there is an extremely long lag time between shots, which means I have to constantly ask my subjects to wait, or I miss the shot completely (like animal or action pics).
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Nice size, but picture quality is very poor

rybo71, Amazon
19 July 2010
  • Summary: I was impressed when I first got the camera (next day using prime). I was a little bummed when I realized it didn't have any internal memory. Should have researched that more closely. No issue, I ran out and got another card. Once I started taking pictures, I expected that this easy to use camera would produce high quality images. Not so. When set on Auto, conditions had to be perfect to get a good quality shot.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

"Way too Many Blurry Pics - Video over-processed"

Big Zombie, CNET
26 January 2010
  • Pros: Small, light weight, miniature, tiny little battery
  • Cons: Too small, too light weight, too miniature, too small a battery, blurry images, weak flash, extremely long delay between shots. Video is over-processed and too light/washed out. Not sure if 12.1 MP is a good size!
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

778129, DP Review
13 September 2009
  • Excerpt: I am completely disappointed in this camera. I have owned and was very pleased with the A620 and 630. My A630 was recently broken and this was supposed to be the replacement. The ONLY good thing I have to say about the camera is the construction is top notch. I chose the 960 because of the wide angle lens and HD video capability. See below: Problems: -Awful CA -Very soft images with lots of obvious noise reduction even in bright conditions.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

great camera, not good night shots or movement shots

Alla Greenberg, Amazon
31 August 2009
  • Summary: the night shots are not very good. The video is good.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Wanted to upgrade, instead I got great HD video with blurry/purple fringed AUTO mode pictures.

HiDef Cineza, Amazon
17 July 2009
  • Summary: Unfortunately after 30 days of review and over 1000 pictures later I am returning this camera. As an avid Canon user (Canon AE-1, S500, and S550), I decided it was finally worth the effort to upgrade out of the world of slow compact flash and go with the latest and greatest. What I found was a major disappointment. PROS: -Size of the camera is great for your pocket. It slips neatly away and is easy to retrieve.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Poor image quality for the Digic IV's....

B. Sheffer, Amazon
23 April 2009
  • Summary: I wish Canon would get a clue and stop fighting the Megapixel war with the other manufacturers....they are all trying to cram too many mexapixel onto the tiny sensor and it shows with image quality. I'm a professional photographer and I've had several Canon point and shoots...my SD 870IS broke so I thought I would buy a new P&S. I bought this and tried it for a week and returned it. Image quality is okay in decent light, but really poor in low light. Waay too much noise.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

User Review

Zitrixx, club.foto.ru
30 April 2013
  • Excerpt: Через 8 месяцев отвалился переключатель режимов съемки.) Ремонт на 1900р + ждать деталь из-за бугра 6 (!!) месяцев. Жесть, какими фотиками только не пользовался, но увы... Доказать даже в центральном офисе Canon что заводской дефект не удалось. Сказали что я сломал. Так что покупайте лучше другую модель!!!
  • Pros: Маленький, качественная сборка, съемка видео HD, хороший диапазон объектива и светочувствительность.
  • Cons: Шумит при высоких исо, а при 3200 картинка 1600х1200. В целом картинка 12мпх не пахнет, хорошо подойдет только для съемки днем., Мылит при зуме, годен только на отдых или пофоткать бытовуху, в остальном придется вылизывать фото.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 4
4.0
Performance 4
4.0
Picture quality 2
2.0
Display 6
6.0
Ergonomics 4
4.0

Horrible

lauri, quesabesde.com
24 July 2010
  • Summary: Cuando compré ésta cámara infame, me costó 300 euros. Ahora la tiene mi hija pequeña para usarla en el tuenti. Es con mucho, la cámara mas mala que he tenido en mi vida y cómo mucha gente, me guié por el diseño y la marca. Deberían despedir fulminantemente a todos los que participaron en la creación de ésta cámara que es un autentico fraude y un insulto a la inteligencia de cualquiera.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Next page >>