Reviews, reviews, reviews...

6.2 out of 10


Kodak EASYSHARE SV811 The Kodak EASYSHARE SV811 is a digi Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Kodak EASYSHARE SV811

Showing 1-4 of 4
Overall 4

Okay, But Depends on What You Need

J. R. Reynolds, Amazon
17 December 2007
  • Summary: I have no complaints about the frame's ease of use or picture quality, but the inability to randomly portray the pictures is a MAJOR drawback to me, and is a big disappointment. Had I known I would NOT have purchased this. What good is being able to put 2GB worth of pictures in the frame if EVERY TIME you turn it on you are faced with the same pictures in the same order?
  • Read full review
Overall 4

Watch out this is a widescreen digital photo frame

Simon L, Amazon
26 January 2008
  • Summary: I have been rather disappointed with this photo frame as I had not realised the implications of it being widescreen. It means that I have to choose between either chopping off the top and bottom of all landscape photos or shrinking the photo to fit the top and bottom which leaves the left and right hand edges blank and so in effect this becomes just like a smaller digital photo frame.
  • Read full review
Overall 4

Big Brand but limited features

Paul Mathews, Amazon
16 December 2007
  • Summary: I went for the Kodak brand but slightly disappointed with the lack of many features which I realised after bying that others are offering a lot more as standard (like internal battery/internal memory). The screen quality is good but the frame is not stylish as much as it looks in the picture. If you are seriously spending this amount of money, it is better to look at other options.
  • Read full review
Overall 4

Knappt godkänd

tobbis, Prisjakt
5 July 2008
  • Summary: Håller med Patrik_G. Det är väl inte bland de bästa fotoramarna men den fungerar aldeles utmärkt. MEN! Den har ingen slumpfuktion. Det vill säga, man kan inte slumpa bilderna utan de kommer i namnordning och allting börjar om när man startar om den. Detta gör den enligt min mening helt värdelös då man enligt mig måste ha så att bilderna slumpas. Därför endast 4 stjärnor. Bortsätt från detta så hade den fått en 8.
  • Read full review Translate to English