www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Intel-core-2-duo-e6850.33274199
7.4 out of 10

Intel Core 2 Duo E6850

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Intel Core 2 Duo E6850

Showing 1-10 of 10
Overall 8
8.0

Four Stars

Joel Krueger, Amazon
6 December 2014
Overall 8
8.0

good ,thank you

juliorex2013, Ebay
7 August 2014
  • Summary: Hello I am so grateful for this product is ok thank you. dhfhdfhdfhngfnj tgfhdfnjgffgnjfgnjfgfgjgfjfjfg​hdsfgdfhdfh dfhdfhdf hdfhsdfh hdfhsdfh dfhsdfhsdfhdfhdfhretjsrtj​yrtyjrszsfghdfdfhdfdf dfhdfh
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Buy this 3.0ghz cpu over the E8400 and save money!

syndikated1, Ebay
26 November 2013
  • Summary: I bought this as an alternative to the E8400 for price reasons. For its purposes I was completely please with the speed and perfomance, I certainly recommend this cpu!
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

great value for the money

drifter86gt, Ebay
29 May 2013
  • Summary: well i had a intel celeron 3400 2.60 ghz fsb 800 mhz dual core, i switched to this one cause i thought it could give me better fps on games by activating fsb 1333 on the bios with this, but it didn't gave much, but in overall i'm happy with it cause my computer is way faster dealing with documents and opening programs and in apps like poser pro and Photoshop it did increased speed.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Very good!

kmp6258, Ebay
29 May 2013
  • Summary: Fast for an older CPU..works great! 1333 FSB not as fast as my quad core FX..but still good! Core processors really haven't changed that much.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

3 times as fast as P4 2.8 HT

Fred, Amazon
23 January 2008
  • Summary: Scripts run three times as fast compared to my old P4 2.8Ghz HT, but as far as everyday performance difference it has been a little disappointing. Windows still takes over 30 seconds to start up, and Adobe InDesign takes about 30 seconds to start compared to about 40 seconds with my old P4. I was expecting a little better.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Not the best overclocker

Edi Murphy, Amazon
7 January 2009
  • Summary: Great out-of-the-box performance, this is one of the best dual-cores from the 65nm processing facilities of Intel, however the 6570 offers a similar upper limit for less money, hence 4 stars only. I paid a little more for this CPU approximately 1 year ago & have no regrets. Correctly installed, it doesn't generate too much heat under load & does everything I throw at it.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

IlBacca, Ciao
25 August 2008
  • Summary: Ho assemblato un PC per la mia ragazza con questo processore e mi sono trovato veramente bene. Molto veloce e il rapporto qualità prezzo ottimo. A dire il vero avrei preferito l'E8400 ma non ne avevano in casa e non mi andava di tornare inoltre era per il compleanno e non volevo farle aspettare il regalo. Le prestazioni sono davvero sorprendenti.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

trevormeyer, Ciao
27 September 2007
  • Summary: que buena tu opinion, muy oportuna, estoy por comprar un sager np9260 el cual consegui en pctorque a un mejor precio, y con esta nueva variedad de quads, que el la main page de sager no estan presentes, estuve leyendo algunos comentarios acerca de que no se recomendaban los quads en estos notebooks por cuestiones de recalentamiento del sistema, la verdad no se mucho del tema, pero a pesar de eso tenia mis dudas, ya que al poseer 4 nucleos uno asume que es mas poderosa,...
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 8
8.0

Prueba de campo del E6850

joravap, Ciao
12 September 2007
  • Summary: Amigos, he tenido instalado en mi Placa P5K3 Delux un procesador intel Quad duo de 2.4 (con 2 gigas de ram ddr3 a 1066bus y la gráfica GeForce 8800GTS), ahora, que he cambiado la Quad por la E6850, ni punto de comparación!! (...), cogi el Oblivion IV en su versión para PS3 y el CPU me iba a 35%, mientras que con la Quad a 46%. Que les puedo decir? 3.0Ghz son 3.0Ghz!!.
  • Pros: Suoperior en desempeño comparada a las Quad duo de 2 . 4
  • Cons: Ninguno, hasta el momento
  • Read full review Translate to English