www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Intel-celeron-430.32653335
7.5 out of 10

Intel Celeron 430

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Intel Celeron 430

Showing 1-10 of 58
Overall 8
8.0

There's much better for new motherboards of course

Marty Gee, Amazon
7 days ago
  • Summary: Solid low power processor. There's much better for new motherboards of course, but for the 775 socket it's a decent choice
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Five Stars

Andrew Santiago, Amazon
14 September 2014
Overall 2
2.0

did not work

Angel, Amazon
25 July 2012
  • Summary: this chip did not work and heats up badly... i wish of never buying this thing.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

nice

Redner, Amazon
24 June 2012
  • Summary: everything went just like it was suppose to go, product was what they said, no problems. good job thanks.only gave them four stars because nothing is perfect always room for improvement.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Great for a NAS

Solozzo, Amazon
3 September 2008
  • Summary: I'm using this in a FreeNAS box in a RAID 10 configuration managing 4 harddrives. I'm nowhere close to maxing out the potential of the chip. I don't know how this would be in an everyday-use computer, but for the price it was perfect for my application.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Fast ship - as described - very satified...

S. Beshera "p2pz.com", Amazon
3 September 2008
  • Summary: Processor - 1 x Intel Celeron 430 / 1.8 GHz ( 800 MHz ) - LGA775 Socket - L2 512 KB - Box Needed a cheap starter cpu for a new build. This chip is a good starter if you can not afford a Core 2 Duo. My board recognized the chip and I was off to the races. Includes heatsink and fan. Very satisfied with the purchase.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Installation 4
4.0
Speed performance 6
6.0

Intel celeron 430

vales84, Ciao
30 May 2012
  • Summary: Ciao a tutti! Nel laboratorio della mia università c'è un pc con installato questo processore, l' intel celeron 430. E' un processore single core che alloggia su slot 775 con frequenza di funzionamento di 1.8 GHz, e 512 Kb di cache. Ha frequenza di bus di 800 MHz ed è costruito con tecnologia a 65 nm. E' un processore di fascia bassa di qualche anno or sono e quindi certamente non è indicato per processi troppo pesanti e impegnativi.
  • Pros: vedi opi
  • Cons: c'è di meglio
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 8
8.0

Excelente desempeño a bajo costo

Ronm, Ciao
24 January 2010
  • Summary: Este procesador es una maravilla a pesar de sus 1.8Ghz , cuenta con arquitectura de 32 bits y 64 bits, con un socket 775, su cache es de 517 kb, es capaz de hacer correr programas que estan destinados a procesador de mayor velocidad, con la ayuda de una tarjeta de video decente no le envidia nada a los core 2, Y con un sistema operativo de 64bits ya nada puedes dejar escapar, pues corres juegos como far cry, Crisys, stalker, fallot 3, etc.
  • Pros: Precio/ no calienta/ desempeño/ cuenta con 32 - 64bits
  • Cons: poco cache/ en programas de edicion de video es algo lento/
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 10
10

Sparsame CPU

Deichlamm "Deichlamm", Amazon
14 September 2009
  • Summary: Der Celeron 430 laüft bei mir in ein einem PC zum Surfen und mal einen Film/TV zu schauen. Die Rechenleistung langt für einfache Office-Arbeiten und mal ein Bild einscannen auch aus. Der Stromverbrauch meines Rechners mit onboard-grafik liegt bei 65-70 watt, was ich für sparsam genug erachte. Da die Wärmeentwicklung sich dank der 35 Watt TDP der CPU in Grenzen hält, bleibt der Pc angenehm leise. Als "Zweitrechner CPU" für das Geld mehr als OK.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 8
8.0

Sparsamer Prozessor aber lauter boxed Lüfter

stuffed_suit "Elektronik-Gourmet", Amazon
16 May 2009
  • Summary: Der Prozessor verrichtet seinen Dienst problemlos in meinem Shuttle K45. Durch das 3-polige Lüfterkabel wird der Boxed-Lüfter nicht geregelt. Die Lautstärke ist dadurch störend. Die Leistung reicht locker für Büroarbeiten, Internet und Multimedia aus. Spiele konnte ich noch nicht testen.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Next page >>