www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Amd-fx-8150.33459782
8.8 out of 10

AMD FX-8150

Great Deal: $738.30

Reviews and Problems with AMD FX-8150

Showing 1-7 of 7
Overall 4
4.0

Not good for extreme gaming!!!

Nihar Khaklari, flipkart.com
13 January 2013
  • Summary: I am an exteme gamer nd I have high demand in faster processing, cpu nd its ability to work wid high end motherboards + multi gpu. Many thin dat having more no. of cores will give you faster performance but trust me I myself have tried it I had tried this over intel i5 and now I have replaced it again wid i7-3770k.........
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

INTEL ROARS & RUNS Where AMD slows for same TASK !!!

Ramnik Verma, flipkart.com
11 December 2011
  • Summary: Intel are the first who made processors for computers, & today they are the only 1 who made processors for NASA robots & advanced super-computers to work crores kilometers far from earth without a single compromise. In 2011, Intel announced that it is working on a car security system that connects to smartphones via an application. Today Intel have 100,100 Employees, where AMD have only 11,000 Employees.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

biju good work, very good knowledge

Virender Singh, flipkart.com
11 December 2011
  • Summary: I am not working with intel or amd, but i am working with a laptop company.Everything matter in technology like cache memory, cores, clock speed, but most important what is the technology is . If we are using a intel same price cpu then i am unable to find the diffrence in performance . but if you saying that only 8 core large cache memory is the performace benhmark, please proove it. Edit or render 3d movie or game , you know the thruth.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

intel is much better then amd

shahdab Khan, flipkart.com
11 December 2011
  • Summary: you can not compare with catch memory and cores intel with 2 cores and amd with 8 cores performance is the same. and after all everyone knows that intel is much better then amd. like for gaming,multitasking.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

Good price... not enough performance

Biju, flipkart.com
27 November 2011
  • Summary: I know this place is crawling with AMD fan boys... so I'm writing to this for opening the eyes of those who are undecided what to buy. To the people who go for specs alone... here are some things to consider 1. Can a webcam of 20 Megapixels replace a DSLR of 12 megapixels? 2. Do you think two cameras of 8 Megapixels produce the same clarity images? 3. A graphic card has around 600+ cores... but can it do the work that the CPU does? and Vice versa? 4.
  • Read full review
Overall 4
4.0

CPU eben

Albert "albertaufreiter", Amazon
8 September 2013
  • Summary: die Lieferung war entsprechend Entfernung zufriedenstellend. was ich aber bemängeln will-ist das am Cpu Spuren von Wärmeleitpaste zu sehen waren.Der Cpu war also schon einmal wo eingebaut.Habe Ihn aber behalten,wegen Dringlichkeit.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 5
4.5

Einfach nur schlecht.

Apocaliptica, geizhals.de
14 October 2011
  • Summary: http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/prozessoren/2011/test-amd-bulldozer/ Die tl;dr Fassung: -Zu teuer -Zu hoher Stromverbrauch -Zu wenig Leistung -Zu spät. 2 Jahre früher und die CPU wäre vielleicht interessant.
  • Read full review Translate to English