www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Dummy.190587
6.0 out of 10

AMD Athlon XP 2000+

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with AMD Athlon XP 2000+

Showing 1-10 of 29
Overall 8
8.0

Excelent!!!

starpassspain, Ebay
7 May 2010
  • Summary: This is a very good processor. Low cost, max performance. The XP series is a hit in the AMD history.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

AMD Athlon XP +2000 Review

Mike_TechGuru, PriceGrabber
16 August 2005
  • Summary: This is a decent chip and it is fairly equivalent to a AMD Sempron +2400 which is also (1.67ghz). This chip will hold enough to play some of the games back in 2003 and early 2004 like Max Payne 2, GTA 3 and Vice City, Battlefield, Call of Duty and others.
  • Pros: Decent chip and great in its time. Good enough to work around a good budget PC.
  • Cons: Not a strong overclocker, you'd pretty much boost it up to a +2200 (1.8Ghz), plus it is only a FSB266 Chip.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

AMD Athlon XP 2000+ 1.67 GHz Processor

Nednam, PriceGrabber
22 July 2004
  • Summary: As always, the AMD processor is stable and costs much less than a comparable Intel. The retail version comes with an extra tall heatsink and it's needed. The processor runs hot, but so far no problems. Detailed step by step instructions make installation a snap. I have it on a MSI micro ATX motherboard in a mini tower with a 300 watt power supply.
  • Pros: Stable, fast, price
  • Cons: Runs hot
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

AMD Athlon XP 2000+ 1.67 GHz Processor

***, PriceGrabber
7 July 2004
  • Summary: I have been using this since last year for my home system I built myself and it is running flowlessly. Ordering now one for my friend. Want to built again a home sytem for browsing typewriting and watching dvd. I can tell this is running faster than my laptop with intel celeron 2.4 GHz.
  • Pros: Works fast and reliable. Greate for daily applications, also for small calculations.
  • Cons: So far have not seen one.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

AMD Athlon XP 2000+ 1.67 GHz Processor

prosound90, PriceGrabber
7 July 2004
  • Summary: very good cpu as i always expected from AMD i like the new xp2000 cpu its fast,runs at low temp about 45C ,low price ,its a geat value,iam going to buy anther one.
  • Pros: fast, low running temp
  • Cons: none so far
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

AMD Athlon XP 2000+ 1.67 GHz Processor

bnormb, PriceGrabber
12 April 2004
  • Summary: I have used amd products and was satisfied with their performance. The product appeared to be attractively packaged, with all included parts visible. I would purchase a like or sinilar product again.
  • Pros: price for value
  • Cons: not up to equivelent pentium 4
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

AMD Athlon XP 2000+ 1.67 GHz Processor

satu87121, PriceGrabber
2 March 2004
  • Summary: AMD always gives you more for your money just be catious to use a mobo that has overheat technology built in to save your processor if your fan dies.
  • Pros: for under 70 bucks this is a smokin deal.
  • Cons: AMD processors do not have built in overheat technology leading to processor being fried.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Take a look at thermal issues

Francisco Duran "fduranm", Amazon
10 June 2003
  • Summary: The Athlon XP is a very cost effective processor due to its low price and high performace. However, you'll have to take some notes on thermal issues. Easily, a processor like this, could take your system to very high temperatures, depending on the machine's configuration, and this could cause severe harm to your computer and/or devices. To lower the risk, you'll need to invest on cooling solutions, for example cooling fans.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

XP 2000

ARCHI34, MercadoLibre
23 June 2010
  • Conclusion: Si usted quiere armar un cpu para XP rapido, utilice Athlon XP
  • Pros: Como toda la linea Athlon XP, es lo mejor en rendimiento.
  • Cons: Solo para win XP, Ojo el mother
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 8
8.0

AMD Atholom 1.67 Ghz XP 2000

RRODRIG812009, MercadoLibre
6 January 2010
Next page >>