www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Amd-athlon-64-fx-53.33545601
5.9* out of 10

AMD Athlon 64 FX-53

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with AMD Athlon 64 FX-53

Showing 1-10 of 15

Expert Review

Tweak Town
7 December 2004

AMD's Athlon 64 3800+ and FX-53 processors

techreport.com
1 June 2004
  • Summary: Well, you've seen the benchmark results, and there's not much I can add. The Athlon 64 FX-53 was already brutally fast, and the new 939-pin version is a tad bit faster still. The Athlon 64 3800+ is darn near as fast as the FX-53, despite having half the L2 cache. If you have the means, I highly suggest picking one up.
  • Read full review
Overall 9
9.0

Athlon 64 3800+ Socket 939 & FX-53 Review

FiringSquad
31 May 2004
  • Conclusion: The Athlon 64 FX-53 and Athlon 64 3800+ are, as expected, products of evolution. We’ve anticipated the debut of Socket 939 for months now, and we’ve had our hands on a 2.4GHz Athlon 64 FX-53 since it launched late March. Even still, it’s an exciting day for AMD and the gamers who’ve been waiting patiently for the new processor interface. With regards to the new Athlon 64 FX-53, don’t expect much more speed than was available before.
  • Read full review

AMD Intros 939-pin CPUs: 3800+ and FX-53

PC Perspective
31 May 2004
  • Excerpt: Even at the beginnings of the life of the Athlon 64 processor, grumblings have been heard about this eminent processor launch.  Reviewers and customer alike were claiming that 939-pin processors based on the Athlon 64 technology were going to be the first 'real product' to look for.  And while the performance of the processors released before now have shown that they were able to compete in a competitive market, the movement you are seeing today from AMD is necessary.
  • Read full review
Overall 9
8.6

AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 Review

FiringSquad
22 March 2004
  • Conclusion: It seems like everything’s been coming up roses for AMD since the Athlon 64 family debuted last year, at least in terms of performance. The Athlon 64 3000+ can be found for just over $200, offering superb flexibility to the mainstream, AMD’s Athlon 64 3400+ is easily faster than any of Intel’s 3.2GHz products, and the new high-end Athlon 64 FX-53 is faster than the 3.4GHz Extreme Edition that costs $300 more.
  • Read full review

AMD's Athlon 64 FX-53

HotHardware
18 March 2004

AMD's Athlon 64 FX-53 processor

techreport.com
18 March 2004
  • Summary: The Athlon 64 FX-53 obliterated the competition in our gaming tests and more than held its own everywhere else, making a very strong argument for AMD's ownership of the Overall Performance Lead. Intel's Pentium 4 Extreme Edition 3.4GHz gave the FX-53 tough competition in much of our test suite, especially in commercial 3D rendering apps, and the P4 Prescott 3.2GHz unexpectedly pushed the FX-53 in Sphinx speech recognition, some of the SPECviewperf component tests, and...
  • Read full review

AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 CPU Review

X-bit labs
18 March 2004
  • Summary: AMD has finally managed to release a CPU with 2.4GHz clock frequency. Due to the new CG core revision we are glad to welcome Athlon 64 FX-53. Read all you wanted to know about the newcomer: a lot of benchmarks, overclocking results and a few exciting tests of the Windows XP 64-Bit Edition for 64-Bit Extended Systems.
  • Read full review

AMD Athlon 64 FX-53 Processor Review

PC Perspective
18 March 2004
  • Excerpt: When AMD launched the Athlon 64 FX-51 processor in September of last year with their desktop AMD64 processor releases, it was met with a mix of skepticism as well as praise.  It seemed to most hardware enthusiasts that the FX line was a last ditch effort to get the performance out of the Athlon 64 line that it needed in order to overtake the P4 line of processors.
  • Read full review

Athlon 64 FX-53 CG-Stepping

Planet 3DNow
12 August 2009
  • Conclusion: Zusammenfassung und Fazit. Nach 20 Seiten detaillierter Betrachtung und Auslotung des Potenzials der neuen AMD CPU ist klar, dass der Athlon 64 FX-53 ein würdiger Nachfolger des "Pioniers" ist. Die CPU skaliert typisch für ihre Architektur gut mit der Taktfrequenz, weshalb sich die 200 MHz extra Takt mehr als auf anderen Plattformen in zusätzlicher Leistung niederschlagen.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Next page >>