www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Silverstone RL04
8.3 out of 10

Silverstone RL04

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Silverstone RL04

Showing 1-7 of 7
Overall 8
8.0

User Review

ross_w, NCIX.com
18 August 2013
  • Summary: nice easy watercooling case.can fit 2 240mm rads with min. work.
  • Pros: great value case
  • Cons: none so far
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

No complaints, great product

ozzyoscy, Scan
26 June 2015
  • Excerpt: A case I always recommend people, whether they're looking for a cheap case or a good case, because this is both. It's large enough for my pretty big Zotac GTX 780 and the ol' Hyper Evo 212 to fit in fine. Temperatures are fantastic, it's easy to get a good flow of air going.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Low budget Shrek-case for cheap budget with not much of expectations

Matt356, Scan
16 January 2015
  • Excerpt: The case is BIG. not Huge but definitely a bigger than regular Mid Case. It looks.... cheap. I know it's Silverstone but man, this one from a distance looks with a little big of imagination like Megatron from old Transformers. From a close up it looks like a matchbox product.
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0

Almost Excellent

DumboBattyhead, Scan
2 September 2014
  • Excerpt: For the money, this is an excellent case with no sharp edges and plenty of fan spaces. If you are not bothered about having easily removeable filters fitted to all inlet fans, then it is excellent value for money.
  • Read full review
Overall 10
10

Excellent

JoeD, Scan
22 May 2014
  • Excerpt: Can't go wrong really especially with the price, bought this as a replacement for my old case and I'm certainly glad I did. Plenty of space to fit everything I had and I would imagine that it would fit most components, plenty of ventilation and 120-140mm case fan slots which come in handy; comes...
  • Read full review
Overall 8
8.0
Design 10
10
Value for money 8
8.0
Usability 6
6.0

Gut, aber nicht perfekt

Testkauf , Conrad
4 October 2014
Overall 8
8.0
Design 10
10
Value for money 8
8.0
Usability 6
6.0

Gut, aber nicht perfekt

Testkauf , Conrad
25 October 2013