Reviews and Problems with Sony Ericsson Xperia arc S / LT18i
Showing 91-100 of 500
24 January 2012
Summary: sony is dam dam better than samsung and htc in terms of quality.its better in music,screen,camera and many other.samsung just copy thier software from other brands.for that reason samsung fit for.i suggest to plz go for sony than for samsung or htc!!!!!!!
Summary: @Sameer Chavan's dude for your kind information sony is not the last to release the updates.and sony is better than htc and samsung because sony takes care of their all smartphones from low-end to high-end thats why they are updating their all smartphones (from xperia mini to arc s) to android 4(ics)....not like samsung who doesn't even updating their galaxy s,upcoming galaxy w many others....
Summary: Other phones are going with higher battery and ram. But sony tries to play it low. It has smaller screen, RAM and battery then HTC Sensation XE, Samsung galaxy S2 and Samsung Note. The battery matters a lot in such devices. Another problem with all Sony devices is that they are the last to release OS updates. The Koreans(Samsung) and Taiwanese(HTC) are fast.
Summary: this is one of the best android mobile i have ever used. And the screen clarity is better than that of the Samsung galaxy S2. It almost beats galaxy S2 even though it is single processor with 1.4Ghz.Again battery back up wise ARC s is giving nearly one and half to two days,which is really good....
Summary: Sony always comes out with great design. But misses out on little things like Internal memory which is a very important factor in a Android. With just 390 MB of internal memory one will not be able to install all the necessary applications.
Summary: Well, no doubt Sony Ericsson comes up with the best design and ergonomics, but is the 27-28 k price justified? Just think about it. The only upgrade you would get from the Arc to the Arc S is the processor. And that's not something to write home about to be honest. A mere bump in CPU clock speed isn't going to make it for anybody.
A good phone, Sony Walkman + Sony PSP + Sony Camera + Sony Bravia
Ankush Gupta, flipkart.com
24 January 2012
Summary: iPhone = iPOD + Phone + PC Sony has applied a similar equation here. No doubt Sony sells everything overpriced, but in this case they have kept the quality high. This phone cannot beat S SG2 in terms of muscles. 1. No front camera which is available even with lower Xperia Neo models. My colleague always teases me with this. No 3G video calling!! 2. Ram 512 Mb, whereas SG2 boasts of 1GB. Although how it is configured is not known as it is internal memory. 3.
Summary: 1) The SE Xperia Arc S has display with FWVGA(854x480) resolution as compared to WVGA (800 x 480) resolution of SGSII. The effect is that when we observe any video on SE ArcS the video is full screen and there are no side cutting black strips/lines as in the case of SGSII. 2) The Display of Xperia Arcs has bravia engine due to which colours are more real and live as compared to SGSII .
BEST PHONE.........THE ONLY PROBLEM....PEOPLE DONT KNOW ABT IT
RAJEEV SINGH, flipkart.com
24 January 2012
Summary: I HAVE BEEN USIN IT FOR THE PAST ONE YEAR. BEFORE BUYING I DID A EXTENSIVE SURVEY OF ALL BRANDS IN THE SAME RANGE. THE PHONE IS JUST AWESOME.....NO COMPARISON TO IT. THE SAMSUNG TABLET IS JUST TOO BIG TO HOLD. THE IPHONE HAS NO GOOD CAMERA (THE GOOD CAMERA IPHONE WAS RELEASED AFTER THIS PRODUCT WAS IN THE MARKET FOR ALMOST 6 MONTHS)....... THE PHONE IS A GADGET U WILL LOVE TO HOLD. SONY HAS UPDATED THE VERSION OF SOFTWARE TO THE BEST.
Summary: My first smart phone and am loving it! Crystal clear sound and great clarity on the picture and the videos - it played YouTube clips seamlessly. Having said that, the 8.1 MP camera is a dream but lacks a secondary camera. But on the plus side it has a HDMI connector and hence you can connect to your flat screens. Screen size is more than adequate and the shape and styling spells of class. Serves my purpose more than expected and am fully pleased with the phone.