www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Samsung U320 / Haven
5.7 out of 10

Samsung U320 / Haven

Verizon Wireless Flip Phone Charcoal Gray 3.49 oz. * Read more

Best Price at Amazon

Reviews and Problems with Samsung U320 / Haven

Showing 1-10 of 14
Overall 6
6.0

Three Stars

Jan Wattles "Bookie", Amazon
20 June 2015
  • Summary: The phone was fine...the battery was not any good. We had to replace it.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Three Stars

Denise, Amazon
4 June 2015
Overall 6
6.0

Three Stars

Kay Aay "Ms. K", Amazon
17 May 2015
  • Summary: For the money spent, it was okay. Seller refunded quickly though as there were some defects.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Three Stars

Stephanie, Amazon
10 July 2014
  • Summary: The Caps get stuck, but when the clear is pushed, it goes back to sm.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Used phones a gamble

johnnyt39, Amazon
27 January 2013
  • Summary: In making my rating: You have to balance a cell that did not work but was cheap with a dealer having a good return policy and honesty. The product was a dud, the service was honest. So I gave it a three.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

caution! very limited features

S. CHIANG, Amazon
13 December 2012
  • Summary: pro: large display, battery life is good, no costly data plan needed con: no camera,no micro SD, can't import phone book
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Samsung Haven

D. Jipson, Amazon
20 August 2012
  • Summary: Phone is basic, which I knew when I bought it. All I need is basic, but I spent a little more for this one because it got pretty good reviews. It's not a bad phone, and before this I used the Samsung Knack. Users rated the Haven better than the Knack ... I wouldn't.
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Design 4
4.0
Value for money 4
4.0
Features 8
8.0
Performance 8
8.0

Two glaring problems

DevotedSon, Samsung
15 July 2011
  • Summary: My elderly mom has used this phone for the past six or eight months or so. Before that she had the Samsung Knack which is virtually the identical phone. Both phones work well and are fairly well suited for the person who wants a no-frills, basic, easy-to-use phone.
  • Pros: Inexpensive, what the heck does "realistic color" mean?
  • Cons: poor side-mount button placement, battery life
  • Read full review
Overall 5
5.2
Design 6
6.0
Value for money 4
4.0
Features 6
6.0
Performance 6
6.0

Basic Phone, Lacks contact features

brb459083485634, Samsung
18 March 2011
  • Summary: Simple basic phone. 95% useful. Cannot transfer or backup contacts, which is very poor in this day and age. - Web site is a joke.
  • Pros: Inexpensive, simple basic phone. 95% useful
  • Cons: Did not meet expectations, no apparent means to transfer or backup contacts
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Samsung refurbished

Annie Freewriter, Amazon
15 September 2010
  • Summary: The product arrived on time and good condition. It said it had a couple of "possible" scratches which were positive scratches, hard to notice with phone on. Good thing we bought an extra battery for four dollars because it needs to be charged often. It has met my needs and expectations. Thank you
  • Read full review
Next page >>