The SPH-i325 is a complete, reliable, dual-band phone for the casual user
27 September 2011
Summary: I've had this phone for over 3 years now, and believe it or not, the SPH-i325 was built pretty damn well! I've never experienced issues with dropped calls (unless I'm in a typical 'dead zone' area); battery life lasts all day, even a couple of days without charging (then again I'm not one to babble...
Summary: Very reliable and simple phone to use and to navigate the functions. Super clear sound and volume quality. Pairs up super easy with a variety of bluetooth headsets. Great phone to have if you don't need alot of bells and whistles.
Excerpt: I've had the phone almost 2 years and will say its been decent.Unfortunately the phone just died the other day RIP:( getting the Intrepid as a replacement Cons: Video to upload is capped at 1Mb and usually files are larger than that.
Summary: I really like this phone. The menus are not that great though or customizable enough. Overall it is great and I really love the style of keyboard as well as the display is wonderful. Hardware wise-great! software wise is the only reserve.
Excerpt: Since the operating system was updated to the Windows Mobile 6.1 software, I like this phone a LOT, and recommend it to anyone who wants a smartphone but not an entertainment center. I don't play games, so I don't know how well it would work for that.
Excerpt: ill try to keep this short, but i can honestly say this is finally a solid windows based pda, with SURPRISINGLY .. GOOD BATTERY LIFE. I have owned the ppc-6700 and the mogul (ppc6800) and because i work in the wireless field ive also experienced other windows based pdas, and with the samsung ace i...
Its ok for light users; not a powerhouse smartphone
DE 2 Philly, Phone Scoop
21 February 2008
Excerpt: The ACE's design is pretty nice. Its extremely light and fits nicely into your hand. Unless you have huge fingers texting is easy and its also very easy to text even w/ just one hand. If I had to compare it to another device I'd say it is better than the Q but not as good as the Q2.