www.testfreaks.com

Reviews, reviews, reviews...

Motorola-defy-mini.33953226
6.9 out of 10

Motorola Defy Mini / XT320 / XT321

Great Deal: $138.49

Reviews and Problems with Motorola Defy Mini / XT320 / XT321

Showing 1-9 of 9
Overall 5
5.0

Expert Review

Phone Arena
12 April 2012
  • Conclusion: Even though it is an okay entry-level Android smartphone, we think you should stay away from the Motorola DEFY MINI, at least for now. It is currently priced at about $250 off contract, which we find totally unjustified considering what you get in exchange. For that amount of cash it would be wiser to pick up the Sony Ericsson Xperia Active or Samsung Galaxy Xcover since both of them are resistant to water and dust, but come with better hardware specs.
  • Pros: Resistant to dust and water damage, Solid build quality, Small and compact
  • Cons: Too little storage space, Slow processor, Too expensive, Flimsy plastic covers
  • Read full review
Overall 5
5.0

Motorola Defy Mini review

Know Your Mobile
28 November 2014
  • Summary: Not a bad smartphone but overpriced launch RRP for what it is
  • Pros: Lightweight, Compact, Reasonable overall performance
  • Cons: Temperamental performance, Inconsistent button controls, Poor display, Some performance issues
  • Read full review
Overall 7
6.5

Motorola Defy Mini review

My Broadband
24 August 2012
Overall 5
5.0

Motorola Defy Mini

Trusted Reviews
22 May 2012
  • Summary: Compact and rugged, is this the ultimate camping phone?
  • Pros: Relatively rugged build, Compact Design, Some nice 'outdoorsy' software tweaks
  • Cons: Not waterproof!, Not much smaller than Defy+, Slow processor
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0

Motorola Defy Mini review

TechRadar UK
15 May 2012
  • Summary: A new, small, low cost addition to the Motorola Defy family
  • Pros: Small, DLNA, Superb music app, Attractive price
  • Cons: Small screen, Poor camera, Problems with Twitter sync, Short on internal storage
  • Read full review
Overall 6
5.5

Motorola Defy Mini review: A rugged Android smartphone for under $200, but still overpriced.

Good Gear Guide.au
5 August 2011
  • Summary: Motorola positions the water resistant, dust-proof Defy Mini as a budget smartphone with a twist, but poor performance and a mediocre user experience actually make it overpriced. The Defy Mini has good battery life and its water resistant casing can definitely handle the elements, but there are far better smartphones out there at this price.
  • Pros: Water resistant, Some handy widgets, Good battery life
  • Cons: Sluggish general performance, Poor user experience, Overpriced
  • Read full review
Overall 6
6.0
Overall quality 7
7.0
Multimedia 5
5.0

Motorola Defy Mini

Mobil
24 August 2014
  • Summary: Motorola fortsätter med sin satsning på vatten- och smutståliga mobiler och tar den här gången ett steg nedåt, både när det gäller prestanda och storlek.
  • Pros: Tålig Formatet
  • Cons: Skärmen Webbläsaren
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 6
6.0

Auswertung der Testberichte

eTest
1 November 2012
  • Excerpt: Das Motorola Defy brachte den angeschlagenen Mobilfunkriesen aus den USA einst wieder in die Erfolgsspur. Entsprechend gab es zwischenzeitlich mit dem Motorola Defy+ bereits einen Nachfolger. Jetzt folgt das Motorola Defy Mini als Einsteigerversion in die Defy-Welt. Optik & Äußeres: Die Defys sind für ihre robuste Außenhaut bekannt. So hat auch das Motorola Defy Mini eine Front aus besonders stabilem Corning Gorilla Glas und ist außerdem resistent gegen Staub und Wasser.
  • Read full review Translate to English
Overall 6
6.0

Motorola Defy Mini (XT320)

parentesis.com
29 August 2012
  • Conclusion: Este modelo en particular va dirigido al sector joven (estudiantes de secundaria, preparatoria y universidad). Su diseño ahora es más atractivo, pues de le agregó algo de color, y no pierde la resistencia propia de la familia Defy, de Motorola.
  • Pros: Su carcasa súper resistente, su diseño renovado, al cual se le agregó un toque de color, y su cristal Gorilla Glass.
  • Cons: Su sistema operativo ya es anticuado y su cámara frontal tiene una resolución muy pobre.
  • Read full review Translate to English