Summary: This phone is so cheap and nasty, it is just a step up from a piece of paper with numbers written on it and just below two cups attached by a piece of string. Please do not get this phone even if they pay you to use it. Slow internet on wifi and 3G, rubbish camera, battery lasts well due to not being able to use most of the features. This phone is so embarrassing that my kids who are aged 5 and 10 put on a disguise when I take it out of my pocket.
Summary: I bought LG-E405 a month ago, this phone often struck when its connected to internet and gets switched off automatically. This phone is completely worthless, its waste of money. The camera and resolution is worst Galaxy Y is a better phone comparing to this handset. You can use Link2sd application to move all the apps to SD card and free your phone memory. You need to root the mobile to allow applications to move to SD card. I'll never recommend LG to any.
Summary: RESOLUTION IS VERY BAD USER INTERFACE IS VERYVERY BAD. ONLY 150 MB AVAILIABLE SPACE TO INSTALL APPS/GAMES SO 1 GB MEMORY IS OF NO USE. GPRS/3G IS VERY SLOW. OVERALL A WASTE OF MONEY MOBILE. EVEN CHINA MOBILES WILL BE BETTER THEN THIS.
Summary: Sim switching irritates Camera clarity is too bad Audio settings are unavailable and bad audio where you'll not enjoy any music Very weak accessories Stucks frequently when connected to internet No option to store the apps in internal memory Message typing is very bad where we cannot opt out word suggestions. Battery life will give only for 8 hours Difficult to search the files stored.
Summary: it has almost all features but absolutely no effect to say a good android phone very few pros 1.1gb internal memory 2.supports adobe flash player CONS 1.it restart several times automatically which makes a horrible experience. 2.horrible camera quality at bad light and night.3mp camera is worse than normal 2mp camera 3.very bad sound quality though its good through headphone 4.ram is 384 mb but user can access only 160-170 mb 5.very slow internet experience even a 2k...
Summary: My friend has htc explorer. The screen is awesome, movies n videos look very nice. The screen of l3 is much below htc, its colors r washed out, and is very basic low resolution screen. lg l3 screen resolution is only 240 x 320 but htc explorer has resolution of 340 x 480 i.e. it has more pixels and thus sharper screen n I suggest to ull to go 2 youtube n see reviews of lg l3 n also htc explorer before u buy-pay attention for screen quality-igyaan has good review of htc...
This phone IS NOT value for money. HTC EXPLORER only 700 rs more
S. K., flipkart.com
8 June 2012
Summary: On paper the LG L3 has a good 800mhz qualcomm snapdragon processor, a 3 megapixel camera and a 1500 mAh battery n 1 GB internal memeory, 4 areas where it SEEMS better than SAMSUNG GALAXY Y n HTC EXPLORER, but only on paper. 1) IN REALITY, the CAMERA is BELOW par, the TOUCH RESPONSIVENESS is slightly below par, the call reception is slightly below par, the screen is low resolution, and all-in-all its a very mediocre n moderate phone not worth 7800rs.