Summary: The film is about a group find themselves on alien planet where they find the predators have become the prey and they must come together if they have any hope of survival. This movie was way better then predator 2 but still not good as the first but this is a fun movie to watch.
Excerpt: A collection of heavily armed strangers find themselves in a remote jungle wilderness and stalked by an unseen assailant. Predators is so similar to the 1987 original it can almost be seen as a remake. It has the same jungle location, the same situations, even many of the same plot devices; the two things it is missing however, are Arnie in his prime and a sense of humour, which is something of a problem seeing as they were the very elements that made Predator work.
Summary: Better than the last two related movies but to me this movie was just like Pitch Black but not as good (that movie isn't good either). I was surprised at how good Adrien Brody was as an action star. I hope he continues the path and chooses more wisely next time.
Summary: let me be honest,I actually enjoyed this film.was it better than the original predator?, hell no. was it better than predator 2?, hell yeah. and best of all,the cast was insane!,i loved the cast.the thing i hated about this film was that it was just slow and there were moments in the fil that should have been cut out or shortened.Nimrod Antal may not be considered a great filmmaker ( the vacancy, armored) but he does know what hes doing with this film.Robert Rodruigez...
Summary: A rather piss-poor excuse for a remake, this film took the franchise of "Predator" and transformed it into an unsubstantial exploration of how graphic an action movie could be. The cast was ill-chosen, not the least of which was Adrien Brody as an homage to Arnold Schwarzenegger; and Topher Grace as a rather un-esteemed, disastrously-written quasi-villain, and Laurence Fishburne as a deluded "survivor" with imaginary friends.
A step in the right direction for Predator movies at last.
9 December 2010
Summary: Before I took a chance on this film there was really only one question I wanted answered... 'Is this film going to be another steaming pile of disappointment like the AVP films?' And the answer, happily, is 'No', though after having to sift through all the unhelpful and uninformative 1 rater reviews here, I never would have guessed. I almost gave this film a miss, but I'm glad I didn't. It was actually quite good, and I'll tell you why (no spoilers I promise).
Summary: As long as all you're looking for is action with a fair amount of bloodshed, Predators is for you. Adrien Brody looked kinda buff, but I still don't buy him as a hardened mercenary. Characters are one-dimensional; just enough to get to know a little about them before they get hacked or blown away. Simple, violent, fun yet nothing spectacular.
Summary: was an okay movie. Never seen the first one so I don't know how to compare. But watching this one didn't make me curious to find out. Interesting enough to check out just because. Not one I'd watch again or suggest to someone when I'm asked "whats a good movie to check out.
Excerpt: A sweet as all sweetness movie. Takes away all the bad camera work of the Alien Vs. Predator movies and allows for the most raw and sliced-up action sequences possible. Acting is basically passable at best, Adrien Brody came off a quite an @$$hole, but it was pretty much intended to be that way.
Summary: In a season of remakes, re-imagining's and sequels, Predators certainly lives up to what's expected of it. It's a re-imagining of the classic 80's action movie which had Arnie take the reigns as the leader of a super band of commando's being hunted by an extra terrestrial in the middle of the (jungle), and ended up spawning quite a franchise, consisting of a sequel, and 2 movie mash ups, the Alien vs. Predator films.