Reviews and Problems with Night At The Museum 2: Battle Of The Smithsonian
Showing 1-10 of 32
11 January 2015
Summary: A much better movie than its predecessor that brings all the great stuff from the first and adds even more! With an even better story than the last one, it's going to be hard to go back to the original after viewing this!
Excerpt: Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian: In this sequel Larry the museum guard returns to the museum years later after becoming a success only to find the museum inhabitants are about to be separated by a sale to the Smithsonian.
Summary: Even for Ben Stiller this is a total embarrassment. Why the hell would you want to be part of this idiotic film. Also shame on Amy Adams for completely lowering her standards for films. The movie made me sick to my stomach.
Summary: Sometimes I wonder why I bothered watching this film again. You cannot possibly take this film seriously because this is not supposed to be serious. But neither was it fun. In fact, I don't think it had any redeeming features.
Summary: Better than the original. The movie decides to utilize even more effectively what made its predecessor so entertaining - exaggerated, caricatured, amusingly overblown characters that don't take themselves seriously in the slightest.
Summary: This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Not as good as the original because of the fact Robin Williams barely appeared in the movie. Despite that, everything else was great, especially Hank Azaria. … Expand
Summary: I really liked the first Night at the Museum, not bowled over, but very entertained. It had great special effects and it was great to see childhood legend Dick Van Dyke again. I was looking forward to this sequel, hoping for the same sort of entertainment.