Summary: I don't know, it seems that a lot of people don't like this movie. I thought it was great. Victor salva did a really good job on this one. It's much better than the first. And it's a different kind of horror movie. They actually kill the stupid thing with a homemade harpoon. That's awesome.
Summary: At a girly sleepover, you would expect a teen horror to get everyone screaming and grabbing for the nearest cushin. You wouldnt expect half of the participants to fall asleep, while the rest pointed out faults with the direction and acting.
Summary: I would hate to believe that such animosity has its fangs bared at an upcoming horror film such as Jeepers Creepers 1 and 2. In broad aspect, if it was Friday 13th or Nightmare On Elm Street coming out today, wouldn't we focus on it so hard that we'd want to call it crap.
Summary: In response to Kevin F's rating you have to remember when this movie is actually set. It's the 1950's so liquid steel was hardly a common amenity. Burning it in fire or acid wouldn't be possible either as the creeper can't be killed. As for the caracter developement, that is a matter of opinion.
Summary: Best: 1) Many parts are truly scary, there's a lot of gore and we get to see much more of the creeper this time. 2) The filmmakers prove that showing a monster close-up for a long time (when done well) can be as suspenseful as only showing glimpses from time to time (the old rule).